Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Weigh In is based on a true story.
Legal or illegal: Waterboarding? Edit
The Greatest President Ever's Latest Greatest Attorney General Ever is being forced to answer such a difficult question regarding the legality of a complex legal question surrounding a nuanced interrogation technique called waterboarding.
Mr. Mukasey has rightfully refrained from arming the terrorists with information which would embolden our enemies while weakening our troops' resolve. But the liberal response is typical: they have called for a linguistic benchmark for a definition, not only of what qualifies as waterboarding, but what qualifies as torture.
|Gerald Miguel Riviera|
|"If it was up to me, whatever we do to help Americans should retroactively be legal, no matter what anyone says. Plus, I think I would like to test it out first. Don't I look good with my shirt off?"|
|"Don't listen to the cow, Geraldo. She's just mad because no man would ever marry her. She's unsatisfied with her lifestyle choice and now wants to torture everyone with her liberal fatness!"|
|"Oh, now here we go!|
I'm fat, so your failure of a president can torture people!
Nice comment, you idiot!"
|"Hold on people, we have to slow down, drink some herbal tea and get the debate back on track..."|
|"SHUT UP HIPPIE!!!"|
|"I suppose this means I'll have to dig out my traditional torture seadoo suit. Hasn't gotten much use since the seven startled stingrays piece."|
|"Come on, folks. Torture is a personal lifestyle choice. I sure won't want to torture another person, but why should I stop anyone else from torturing anyone else?"|
Global warming: Fact or myth?Edit
The topic of global warming has received a great deal of attention in the recent years. In 2007, the so-called "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change", or "IPCC", published a report claiming that global warming is very real, very serious, and very man-made, and that this conclusion is based on the best available work from a `majority consensus' of scientists. However, another group of scientists have challenged this consensus by saying that the very fact that this consensus exists shows that it is not a consensus, and the truth is that All The Science Is Not In.
So, is global warming a fact, or a myth? To kick start the debate, let us begin with Mrs. William Penn:
|"ur a traiter why not just shut up an go back to cuba u lard-ass fatso librul lololol"|
|"I was a high-flying scientist until the Academic Inquisition persecuted me for disputing global warming. True story."|
|"No! You got it all wrong! We're not polar bears! We're brown bears! And we have nothing to do with this Carbon Credits for a New World Order thing! It was all Al Gore's idea!"|