Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Rupert Murdoch is a sextillionaire and owner of all known technological advancements. Murdoch came from Captain Dundee's country and also has dominion over most of the earth. Sure the liberals all want you to believe Mr. Murdoch is an Australian, but many would not, primarily because he is the owner and inventor of the Fox News Channel in America, which tells Republicans what to think.
The liberal lies probably started because Mr. Murdoch bought Australia as a young man. He started out with nothing to his name other than one measely, rickety, little slave ship to his name. Other than that all poor Rupert had to his name was a mere eighty billion in personal wealth, a meager sum in the eyes of an older, richer Rupert. Even if this was an unwise investment in a Godless useless country, Mr. Murdoch is still a genius in the eyes of his underlings because of his vast wealth, which is factually known to be the sole measure of human worth. Soon, Murdoch would invest heavily in phone-tapping technology, forever securing his place alongside Jesus, Ronald Reagan, and Rush Limbaugh as the greatest human beings to ever exist.
In the mid-1980's, Murdoch bought The Internets, and what was later to be known as MySpace (an ingenious move that promises to make him tons of money). He now owns the souls of all who have a MySpace page, Pat Robertson, and is busy acquiring those of godless journalists.
Rupert Murdoch was born somewhere in between the sixth and fifth layers of Hell (Australia). No one knows quite where because a nice married couple who were a genetic dead end found him in a field by their farm when he was 10 days old. When they found him, he was holding an apple pie in one hand and an American flag in the other. He was also playing baseball, praying to Jesus, picketing an abortion clinic and voting for Barry Goldwater for President and Ronald Reagan for Governor of the State of California. He then killed a bear with his bare hands as it tried to attack the couple who found him.
By the age of six weeks Rupert could fly, shoot laser beams from his eyes and was bulletproof. He could also throw a wicked curve ball.
Rupert bought his first Australian newspaper when he was 10 months old. By the time he was 10 years old he owned all of Australia. At this point he started News Corp. and shortly thereafter founded the Greatest Television Channel in history; Fox.
Rupert Murdoch believes in the sanctity of marriage, so he married three times to spread its sanctity.
The Pillar of IntegrityEdit
Mr. Murdoch may be best known in the this country as the man who created Fox News as a counterweight to what he saw as a factual bias in the news media. This so called factual bias come mostly from them reporter people who's only goal is to take back the american way of life. But thank God for Sir. Sir is uber alles. Pray to Sir Murdoch for giving us good propaganda to hasten our decline as the world's greatest nation.
More than 30 years after the Australian-born Mr. Murdoch arrived on the American newspaper scene and turned The New York Post into a scummy, right-leaning tabloid, his holding company, the News Corporation, has offered $5 billion to buy a pillar of the business news establishment — Dow Jones, parent company of The Wall Street Journal.
The sale would give Mr. Murdoch control of a reputable journalistic authority in which he is an active, aggressive participant in ruining. What worries his critics is that Mr. Murdoch will use The Journal, which has won many Pulitzer Prizes and has a sterling reputation for accuracy and fairness in business though unabashed elitist Republican bias in politics, as yet another tool to further his myriad financial and political agendas. This is just another liberal lie.
“It is hard to imagine Rupert Murdoch publishing The New York Post in Midtown Manhattan, with all of his personal and political biases and business interests reflected every day, while publishing The Wall Street Journal in Downtown Manhattan with no interference whatsoever,” James Ottaway Jr., a 5 percent shareholder and former director of Dow Jones, said recently.
Members of the Bancroft family, which controls Dow Jones, have sought elaborate assurances from Mr. Murdoch that he will preserve the independence of The Journal’s news coverage. Last night, advisers to both sides said they were close to reaching an agreement on editorial control, but it was unclear whether the Bancrofts would approve a deal. When he bought The Times of London in 1981 he gave similar assurances, but some former editors say he meddled with news operations anyway.
Mr. Murdoch declined a request for an interview, but has recently said he would preserve The Journal’s independence. Gary L. Ginsberg, a News Corporation executive, said it was “insulting” for anyone to suggest that Mr. Murdoch would compromise the integrity of “one of the world’s great newspapers” adding, “It’s not good business and it’s not good politics and it’s absurd on its face.”
The Savvy BusinessmanEdit
From his beginnings as a proprietor of a single Australian newspaper, Mr. Murdoch now commands a news, entertainment and Internet enterprise whose $68 billion value slightly exceeds that of the Walt Disney Company.
The American newspaper industry has never seen a publisher quite like him. Mr. Murdoch has long been a pivotal figure in England and Australia, and in the dozen years since he has moved his base of operations to this country, he has insinuated himself into the political and financial fabric of the United States. His businesses have thrived in a highly regulated environment in part because of his remarkable ability to mold the rules to fit his needs.
This became clear in the regulatory fight over media ownership, a battle critical to Mr. Murdoch’s audacious creation of a fourth national television network, Fox. He has also turned his political clout on business rivals, as he did when he mounted a campaign recently against the Nielsen television rating agency.
“Rupert is sort of an 18th-century guy: the world is still forming, and he’s going to do what he can to hack out a place in the wilderness and defend it,” said Richard D. Parsons, the chairman of Time Warner, who both competes and socializes with Mr. Murdoch.
Rumor has it that this lost son of Australia will be given a Hero's Welcome once the renounces his American Citizenship, that of course is a liberal lie. Why would Rupert Murdoch renounce the best citizenship in the world?
Those Damn KennedysEdit
Shortly before Christmas in 1987, Senator Edward M. Kennedy taught Mr. Murdoch a tough lesson in the ways of Washington.
Two years earlier, Mr. Murdoch had paid $2 billion to buy seven television stations in major American markets with the intention of starting a national network. To comply with rules limiting foreign ownership, he became an American citizen. And to comply with rules banning the ownership of television stations and newspapers in the same market, he promised to sell some newspapers eventually. But almost immediately he began looking for ways around that rule.
Then Mr. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, stepped in. Mr. Kennedy’s liberal politics had made him a target of Murdoch-owned news media outlets, particularly The Boston Herald, which often referred to Mr. Kennedy as “Fat Boy.” He engineered a legislative maneuver that forced an infuriated Mr. Murdoch to sell his beloved New York Post.
Mr. Murdoch was able to buy back the tabloid five years later, but the sale represented a rare and, some say, transforming defeat.
“Teddy almost did him in,” said Philip R. Verveer, a cable television lobbyist. “I presume that over time, as his media ownership in this country has grown and grown, he’s realized that you can’t throw spit wads at leading figures in society with impunity.”
In fact, among the ranks of the lobbyists who have done Mr. Murdoch’s bidding in Washington in recent years is Anthony Podesta, Mr. Kennedy’s former counsel.
But at the end Mr. Murdoch won, who is laughing now Fat Boy?
Buy Whoever Is On SaleEdit
Over time, Mr. Murdoch has shown an ability to adapt to changing political winds. In Britain, his newspapers had a long history of being pro-Tory and anti-Labor, and he was personally close with former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. But in 1997, two of Mr. Murdoch’s papers endorsed Tony Blair for prime minister. Mr. Murdoch became a frequent guest at No. 10 Downing Street, “effectively a member of Blair’s cabinet,” said Lance Price, who was a Blair spokesman from 1998 to 2001. This show they were being fair and balanced, you see, nothing wrong with that.
Mr. Murdoch had reason to court Mr. Blair: ensuring that the new government would allow him to keep intact his British holdings, which by then included The Times of London, multiple tabloids and a stake in Sky News. Many in the Labor Party under Mr. Blair favored the enactment of media ownership limits, which could have forced Mr. Murdoch to divest some of his interests. But Mr. Blair “quietly dropped the policy,” Mr. Price said. The reason was that Murdoch made him see the light and if he didnt follow his advice, he would regret it...
“Blair’s attitude was quite clear,” Andrew Neil, the editor of The Sunday Times under Mr. Murdoch in London from 1983 to 1994, said in an interview. “If the Murdoch press gave the Blair government a fair hearing, it would be left intact.”
The Right Kind of American ImmigrantEdit
Mr. Murdoch’s trajectory in the United States has been similar. His credentials as a purveyor of conservative journalism notwithstanding, he operates like many less visible corporate executives in not allowing his personal politics to get in the way of his bottom line.
An analysis of campaign finance records shows that since 1997, Republicans have received only a slight majority — 56 percent — of the $4.76 million in campaign donations from the Murdoch family and the News Corporation’s political action committees and employees. Since Democrats won control of Congress in the 2006 elections, the company and its employees have given more than twice as much to Democrats as to Republicans, the records show.
“We did seek more balance,” said Peggy Binzel, Mr. Murdoch’s former chief in-house lobbyist. “You need to be able to tell your story to both sides to be effective. And that’s what political giving is about.” Yet liberals continue to tell more lies and fail to tell our side of the story...
A Friend To The LobbyistEdit
Mr. Murdoch has an army of outside lobbyists, who have reported being paid more than $11 million since 1998 to address issues as diverse as trade relations, programming decency and Internet regulation. Nothing wrong with that, this is another form of freedom of speech, corporate freedom of speech.
One firm focuses almost exclusively on parts of the tax code that affect the News Corporation. By taking advantage of a provision in the law that allows expanding companies like Mr. Murdoch’s to defer taxes to future years, the News Corporation paid no federal taxes in two of the last four years, and in the other two it paid only a fraction of what it otherwise would have owed. During that time, Securities and Exchange Commission records show, the News Corporation’s domestic pretax profits topped $9.4 billion. Which is untrue, Mr. Murdoch is a Real American and he pays for his taxes, always.
The News Corporation’s outside lobbying team has been a veritable political Noah’s ark. It has included Republicans like Ed Gillespie, former Republican Party chairman; former Senator Alfonse M. D’Amato of New York; and the firm headed by former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York. But it has also included former Democratic members of Congress, as well as several high-ranking Clinton administration officials, including Jack Quinn, former White House counsel. For the day when the flood comes so when liberal america drown the only survivors would be Real Americans.
Mr. Murdoch’s association with the Clintons
is perhaps the best example of his ever-morphing relationships with the powerful, and theirs with him. For years, the former president was a favorite target of The New York Post, which seemed to delight in referring to him as “former horndog-in-chief.” a liberal fabrication, why would he be friendly with the Clintons? They are monsters.
In October 2002, Mr. Clinton and Mr. Murdoch had a lunch meeting at Mr. Clinton’s office in Harlem. It was arranged by Mr. Ginsberg, who had worked in the White House counsel’s office in the Clinton administration and is now the News Corporation’s executive vice president for corporate affairs. Nothing so see here...
More recently, Mr. Murdoch donated $500,000 to the former president’s Global Initiative and was one of its featured panelists at a 2005 event in New York. In 2006, The Post issued a surprising endorsement of Mrs. Clinton in her Senate re-election bid. On June 5 and 6 of this year, Mr. Ginsberg and Peter A. Chernin, president and chief operating officer of the News Corporation, were hosts of back-to-back fund-raisers for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, one in New York and one in Los Angeles. More liberal lies, by the way did you know that Mrs. Clinton has regrets of her liberal identity and she is thinking of joining the republican party?
Controller Of Ad Sales TechnologiesEdit
In early 2004, an alarm went off at the News Corporation headquarters.
Nielsen Media Research was preparing to switch to a more sophisticated technology to calculate ratings that television stations use to set advertising rates for local programming. Results of a trial run showed sharp drops in ratings for shows carried on stations owned by the News Corporation, particularly those aimed at minority viewers. This was clearly a liberal conspiracy to undermine Rupert Murdoch and paint him as a racist.
With millions of dollars at stake, Mr. Murdoch sprang into action. He hired the Glover Park Group, a consulting firm with deep ties to the Clinton administration, to run a grass-roots ground war. Charging that the system was faulty and that it undercounted minorities, the firm started an extensive advertising campaign intended to delay the rollout of the new technology and staged protests around the country that drew such unlikely allies as the Rev. Al Sharpton (Rupert's new black friend who then became unfriended). Among the Democrats who wrote to Nielsen opposing the new system was Mrs. Clinton, probably the only time she did something reasonable.
The New York Post pursued the story, running news headlines like “Nailing Nielsen” and routinely failing to mention its parent company’s interest in the outcome. Why should they? They have nothing to hide.
The resulting two-year campaign was unusually brazen, even by Beltway standards. Protesters massed outside Nielsen offices in New York. The atmosphere grew so charged that Nielsen’s chief, Susan Whiting, hired a personal bodyguard and the company strengthened security at its headquarters, according to Nielsen officials. But these brave Americans wouldnt leave, not until they stopped this liberal conspiracy.
At one point, Ms. Whiting publicly accused Mr. Chernin and Mr. Murdoch’s son Lachlan of threatening to do “everything possible to discredit you and the company in Washington” if she did not back down. Mr. Chernin and Mr. Murdoch publicly denied making the threat. Threats we all know were liberal fabrications.
But the News Corporation turned to Republican allies to put pressure on Nielsen. Senator Conrad Burns, a Montana Republican who was chairman of the Commerce Committee’s communications subcommittee, and Representative Vito J. Fossella, a New York Republican, introduced legislation that threatened Nielsen with government oversight. The only time we need government oversight if we want to stop the spread of communism.
One day after the bill was introduced, The New York Post ran an opinion article co-written by Mr. Fossella expressing outrage over plans for a museum at ground zero in Lower Manhattan. A news report in the paper that day raised the same concerns. Mr. Ginsberg said “the notion that Rupert had anything to do with that is laughable.” Which is true, Rupert Murdoch was too busy trying to stop the mooslims from building sekret mosques.
Political contributions flowed to nearly all the legislation’s supporters. In 2005, the year the legislation was introduced, records show that the bill’s 29 sponsors and co-sponsors together received at least $144,650 in donations from the News Corporation’s political action committees and lobbyists. But since this is free money, this is not considered a bribe.
Ultimately, the dispute was settled quietly. Mr. Murdoch succeeded in keeping the old rating system in place for several months in the three top markets, New York, Chicago and Los Angeles. Those months included the sweeps period, when advertising rates are set. Saving the Free Market from the socialist racist rating system.
Mr. Ginsberg said the campaign was successful in highlighting concerns about tracking minority viewership and “educating certain groups as to how to use this new technology.” so they can stop this racist system from spreading.
But Dale Snape, who lobbied for Nielsen, said: “It was a classic example of him using all his resources to try to politically influence an outcome — he bought a Hill debate. It was scorched earth, and it was all about money. They created a public interest furor where there was none.” Dale Snape admits that they were fools and they will never again question the wisdom of Mr. Murdoch.
The Media EmpireEdit
the world would be awful.
For more than 70 years, the federal government has regulated media ownership to protect against any entity gaining too much power over the dissemination of information. And for much of the last two decades, Mr. Murdoch has chafed against those restrictions, winning exceptions and easing regulations. He was fighting for freedom, he was fighting for us, he was fighting for the dream that a little guy from Australia can rule the media world and reshape it to the right direction, the rightwing direction.
Again and again, Mr. Murdoch won crucial skirmishes with the Federal Communications Commission. In this he was helped most by his Republican allies, including former Speaker Newt Gingrich and the Bush administration, which has promoted measures to allow more consolidation. It was a glorious battle!
During the Clinton administration, Mr. Murdoch was able to draw upon Republican support when the F.C.C. chairman at the time, Reed E. Hundt, opened an investigation into whether the News Corporation had violated commission rules in acquiring television stations to form the Fox Network.
According to two former F.C.C. officials, Mr. Murdoch’s chief in-house lobbyist at the time, Preston Padden, confronted Mr. Hundt’s chief of staff at a meeting at a coffee shop near the agency’s headquarters. Mr. Hundt would not be able to “get a job as dog-catcher” if the F.C.C. took away a single News Corporation television license, Mr. Padden warned, they said. Which is clearly a liberal lie, he doesnt qualify asa dog-catcher, a very lucrative and overly glorified government work.
The warning, one of the officials said, “was designed to send a harsh signal that if we continued, they would do everything in the world to make our life miserable.” As Mr. Hundt later recalled in a memoir, Mr. Murdoch assailed him in an op-ed article in The Wall Street Journal, and Congressional Republicans rose up against him. They all new liberal lies wont be tolerated and they fought to have him apologize to Mr. Murdoch, who was this nice Real American guy. A Real Patriot and him a liberal scum.
In the end, the F.C.C. found that the deal
had violated the rules was alright and there was nothing suspicious. But Mr. Hundt declined to strip Mr. Murdoch of his licenses, reasoning that the fault lay with the Reagan-era F.C.C. for with communist liberals trying to undermine freedom and the free market as they were jealous of him so they tried to sabotage Murdoch's media empire by approving the acquisitions in the first place. Mr. Padden, who has left the News Corporation, refused requests for an interview.
It was the first of many victories for Mr. Murdoch in the new political climate that swept into Washington in 1994 when the Republicans won control of Congress. It was a fortunate time for Mr. Murdoch, whose business interests and political ideology were in ascendancy. He knew he would be able to save America from the liberal disease that was plaguing the nation.
The new Congress overhauled telecommunications laws for the first time in decades, allowing media companies like Mr. Murdoch’s to expand by increasing the share of the national audience they could reach.
So long as a company did not reach more than 35 percent of American households, it could buy as many stations as it wanted. So long as they take the pledge that they wont cheat or steal (pledge non-binding of course, we can trust his word).
Mr. Murdoch’s lobbyists were also able to get a provision in the bill requiring the F.C.C. to review the cap periodically. It was just such a review that led the Bush administration to increase the cap again in 2003. I mean, why not? Nothing bad happened. By then, Mr. Murdoch had bought additional stations that put him over the 35 percent limit,
as had another company, Viacom. but what is bending the rules among friends?...
The F.C.C. chairman at that time, Michael K. Powell, proposed a broad loosening of media ownership rules, including raising the cap to 45 percent. (Two of Mr. Powell’s top advisers, Susan Eid and Paul Jackson, now work for Mr. Murdoch.) And everyone agreed this was the right thing to do.
Ultimately, a federal appeals court threw out the new rules because they are commies who hate America. But by then, Congress and the White House had intervened, passing into law the 39 percent compromise, which allowed Mr. Murdoch to gorge more liberal medias and then transform them into Real American minions to salvage America.
Mr. Lott, an outspoken critic of media consolidation (and a secret bear), agreed to the increase because it was still lower than what Mr. Powell had proposed, said his spokesman, Nick Simpson. Mr. Simpson added that Mr. Lott did not want to force companies to sell stations and that his book deal did not affect his view of Mr. Murdoch’s legislative agenda. (buy book now and you get a 15% discount!)
Many companies published books by public officials. But because of Mr. Murdoch’s wide business interests, HarperCollins’s book deals have at times drawn scrutiny from liberals and brainiacs who dont appreciate good lilitura... lite... what's that dang word... BOOK READING. Its decision to cancel a book critical of Chinese Communist leaders by Hong Kong’s last British governor was assailed as a move by Mr. Murdoch to protect his Chinese business interests, a charge he denied. This was confirmed to be a liberal lie, our Chinese Masters need protecting from criticism, criticism from the left and hippies who hate America.
HarperCollins provoked a firestorm when it gave Mr. Gingrich a $4.5 million book contract as Congress was preparing to redraw the media ownership rules. The liberals just dont appreciate good... book reading.
Mr. Ginsberg pointed out that Mr. Murdoch later fired the Gingrich book’s editor for making what he regarded as an “uneconomical and unseemly” deal. He said that in general Mr. Murdoch did not involve himself in decisions about book contracts, and added, “If these books aren’t viable, they aren’t published.”
Mr. Lott’s book sold 12,000 copies, according to Nielsen Bookscan, which tracks about 70 percent of all domestic retail and Internet sales. Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, received $24,506 from HarperCollins for his modest-selling book “Passion for Truth,” according to financial disclosure forms. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Republican of Texas, got $141,666 for her book “American Heroines,” which has sold better. All sit on either the Commerce or Judiciary Committees that most closely oversee the media business.
HarperCollins has also given book deals to Senator Chuck Hagel, Republican of Nebraska, and a $1 million advance to Justice Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court, both of whose books are due out next year. Demonstrating that republicans, tea baggers, and patriots love to... book reading.
A former HarperCollins executive, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the company, said Mr. Murdoch was less hands-on than people assumed. “It’s not done in a direct way where he issues instructions,” the executive said. “It’s a bunch of people running around trying to please him.” And we all know they serve at the pleasure of Mr. Murdoch, if you know what I mean. *wink* *wink*
Ms. Binzel, the former chief government strategist for the News Corporation, said Mr. Murdoch got the breaks he did in the United States based on the merits, not his political connections. He took on the major networks and created more competition in the media marketplace, something regulators had long desired, she said. He pulled his own bootstraps and he got no help from anyone.
“Rupert has always been a visionary, and when you bring in a visionary, they are frequently going up against the establishment,” she said. “So much of what Rupert has faced in Washington has been getting rid of rules that protect incumbents. The reason he convinced people to do that was that he was going to be providing something new.” And he did, he provided a new path for Real Americans to change America's direction from liberal hell to Conservative Paradise... and God was pleased.
No Bad News Is Good NewsEdit
Mr. Murdoch convinced the Bancroft family to sell him The Journal. He promised that he would take nice care of it.
Dow Jones proposed a committee to safeguard the paper’s editorial independence that included a continuing role for some members of the Bancroft family and current Journal editors and executives.
Mr. Murdoch said he prefered the model of committee used at The Times of London. That way the paper would remain fair and balanced. His company bought The Times in 1981 and in order to win approval for the deal Mr. Murdoch agreed to an independent oversight committee and guidelines intended to prevent him from meddling in coverage.
According to interviews with former Times editors and affidavits filed in an unrelated 1995 libel suit, there were clashes over the publisher’s involvement in the paper from the very start. But of course, these are liberal lies.
Harry Evans, who was editor at the time of Mr. Murdoch’s acquisition and
was forced out soon after decided to leave to spend more time journalising his family, he wrote a memoir vividly describing his constant fights with the new publisher. In his affidavit, Mr. Evans describes Mr. Murdoch’s ordering the publication of a cartoon that Times editors had deemed tasteless and his complaining that too many stories had a left-wing bent. Another former editor said Mr. Murdoch once pointed to the byline of a correspondent and asserted, “That man’s a Commie.” And he was right, he was a secret leftist commie so he was arrested and taken to Gitmo.
Fred Emery, another former Times editor, said Mr. Murdoch once said to him: “I give instructions to my editors all around the world; why shouldn’t I in London?”
The turmoils of those first years subsided, in part, one former Times editor said, because Mr. Murdoch got rid of those who did not adhere to his politics, you know, commie hippie bear lovers and American traitors. “He puts people in who will do his bidding,” said Mr. Neil, the former editor. "You know, Real Americans and Patriots".
The current editor of The Times, Robert Thomson, painted a different picture: “I’ve had absolutely no interference and a lot of investment in a loss-making newspaper, for which Rupert Murdoch gets no credit.” Which is true, Rupert Murdoch is the hardest working Real American in American who doesn't even get thanks for his sacrifice to keep us safe from the liberal media.
Under Mr. Thomson, the business pages of The Times expanded, and there are now 18 foreign reporters, compared with 8 when he came to the paper. The Times is the only British newspaper with a Baghdad bureau. Making his free market fox news style of business profitable!
Mr. Thomson, who played an important role at The Journal, said Mr. Murdoch would invest in the paper and expand overseas coverage. As of right now they are waiting for confirmation of the acquisition of BSkyB. It shouldnt be difficult.
Over the years, as Mr. Murdoch built his empire, he lusted after The Journal and he used to have wet dreams about it. And as you know real men must show they virility by lusting after more newspapers, which is why he is not one newspaper man. Sorry tuts, you cant tie him down! Which is why he will also buy the Daily Prophet and stop that nonsense of slandering the guy you are not suppose to name or something...
In the mid-1980s, he attended a black-tie press dinner in New York and found himself sitting next to Julie Salamon, then The Journal’s film critic and a former New York Times reporter. She vividly recalls his fascination with the inner workings of the newspaper and said he clearly expressed his desire to own it someday. Maybe even take the Journal to the beach and
date rape it. treat it right.
Ms. Salamon initially dismissed Mr. Murdoch. “The idea of this tabloid guy buying The Journal, which was then at the zenith of its success, seemed preposterous,” she said.
But by the end of the meal, impressed by Mr. Murdoch’s canny sense of the American media landscape, Ms. Salamon said, “I went home with a funny feeling in the pit of my stomach, like this guy might actually do it.”
Murdoch Declares War on Series of TubesEdit
To Murdoch the series of tubes are his to control and should stop the free ride to these cyber welfare queens
Rupert Murdoch and Stephen ColbertEdit
Stephen Colbert has been trying for years to get Mr. Murdoch's attention and perhaps he is close to getting it! It's too bad the rest of the liberal media will never understand Mr. Murdoch. Or the importance of Fair & Balanced reporting.
You can't handle the facts!!
July 17, 2011: Never ForgetEdit
Good news, everyone! There is nothing to worry, as of right now the legal department is already working to make new laws to make sure Rupert Murdoch gets immunity from prosecution from those nasty commies.
- Rupert Murdoch is married to a Chinese Ninja Kung-fu master, no liberal terror pie will be able to approach him.
- He is very humble.
- He is like a young Citizen Kane.
Do Not Also SeeEdit
- Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism
- New York Times
- Washington Post
- Huffington Post
- News of the World. I warn you. DO NO SEE IT!
- Murdoch's attempted suicide Lies!
- Wendi Deng
- Hacking of competition
- More Hacking scandal in America
- Fabricated evidence
- Hacking for Profit in America
- Corporate Hacking
- James Murdoch's filthy secret
- James Murdoch: a Sekret Socialist Hippie? His sister think so.
Enemy Hit ListEdit
- Rupert's new plan
- Rupert to take over series of tubes
- Rupert Murdoch to buy better laws
- Libural Media continues to slander Rupert Murdoch
- How Rupert Murdoch got the biggest exclusive ever in the century!
- Rupert Murdoch to be crowned King of England
- Rupert Murdoch in the hunt for the one ring
- Leave Rupert Murdoch alone, he is innocent!
- Rupert Murdoch to visit the Watergate hotel
- Rupert Murdoch cries like a little girl
- Rupert Murdoch promises to find the real hackers who smeared his reputation
- HORROR!! Murdoch cries like a little girl! What have you done, liberals?!
- The Horror! Liberal lie continues!
- Murdoch's daughter arrested for trying to tell the truth!!
- liberals are destroying freedom of speech!
- Glenn Beck prays for Fox News
- Wall Street Journal to get more fair and valance
- Joowish commie continues his vicious attack against Fox News
- Rupert Murdoch to hire army of lawyers to defend him. They will be monitored carefully to make sure they are worth every penny
- Murdoch still a friend of the English American people of UK
- liberal Australians now trying to slander Murdoch